Review



cell growth medium 2  (PromoCell)


Bioz Verified Symbol PromoCell is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol PromoCell manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    PromoCell cell growth medium 2
    Cell Growth Medium 2, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1023 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cell growth medium 2/product/PromoCell
    Average 99 stars, based on 1023 article reviews
    cell growth medium 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    PromoCell cell growth medium 2
    Cell Growth Medium 2, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cell growth medium 2/product/PromoCell
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cell growth medium 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    PromoCell growth factors
    Growth Factors, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/growth factors/product/PromoCell
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    growth factors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    PromoCell cell growth medium
    Cell Growth Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cell growth medium/product/PromoCell
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cell growth medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    PromoCell skeletal muscle cell growth medium
    Skeletal Muscle Cell Growth Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/skeletal muscle cell growth medium/product/PromoCell
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    skeletal muscle cell growth medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell mesenchymal stem cell growth medium 2
    Mesenchymal Stem Cell Growth Medium 2, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mesenchymal stem cell growth medium 2/product/PromoCell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mesenchymal stem cell growth medium 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell epidermal growth factor
    Epidermal Growth Factor, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/epidermal growth factor/product/PromoCell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    epidermal growth factor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell endothelial cell growth medium mv
    Characterisation of sEVs secreted by fetoplacental <t>endothelial</t> cells (fpECs) from term (T, n = 6), preterm (PT, n = 6) and Early‐Onset preeclamptic (EO‐PE, n = 4) pregnancies. (A) Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of sEVs (scale bar: 200 nm). (B) NTA: Size and concentration of particles, with size (x‐axis) plotted against particle concentration normalised to cell count at the time of isolation (y‐axis). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). (C) Violin plots display the total concentration of sEVs (normalised to cell count at isolation) as measured by NTA. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by pairwise Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Adjusted p values are indicated (* = p < 0.05; ns = not significant). (D) Western blot analysis of sEVs using established sEV markers (Alix, TSG101, Syntenin‐1), endothelial marker (CD31) and non‐vesicular marker (ApoB).
    Endothelial Cell Growth Medium Mv, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/endothelial cell growth medium mv/product/PromoCell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    endothelial cell growth medium mv - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    PromoCell endothelial cell growth medium
    Characterisation of sEVs secreted by fetoplacental <t>endothelial</t> cells (fpECs) from term (T, n = 6), preterm (PT, n = 6) and Early‐Onset preeclamptic (EO‐PE, n = 4) pregnancies. (A) Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of sEVs (scale bar: 200 nm). (B) NTA: Size and concentration of particles, with size (x‐axis) plotted against particle concentration normalised to cell count at the time of isolation (y‐axis). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). (C) Violin plots display the total concentration of sEVs (normalised to cell count at isolation) as measured by NTA. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by pairwise Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Adjusted p values are indicated (* = p < 0.05; ns = not significant). (D) Western blot analysis of sEVs using established sEV markers (Alix, TSG101, Syntenin‐1), endothelial marker (CD31) and non‐vesicular marker (ApoB).
    Endothelial Cell Growth Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/endothelial cell growth medium/product/PromoCell
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    endothelial cell growth medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell mesenchymal stem cell adipocyte differentiation medium
    Single-cell RNA sequencing profiling of joint cell populations following extracellular vesicle (EVs) treatment. (a) The UMAP plot displaying the classification of joint cell populations into ten distinct clusters under three conditions: WT, PBS-treated (PBS), and EVs-treated (EVs). ( b ) Cell typing of clusters based on gene expression. Cluster 1 (NK cells), Cluster 2 (T cells), Cluster 3 (pre-B cells), Cluster 4 (Neutrophils), Cluster 5 (B cells), Cluster 6 (Chondrocyte progenitor cells), Cluster 7 (Hematopoietic progenitors), Cluster 8 <t>(Mesenchymal</t> cells), Cluster 9 (Plasma cells), and Cluster 10 (Erythroblasts). ( c ) Heatmap displaying the expression of representative marker genes for each cluster, including Col12a1 for the
    Mesenchymal Stem Cell Adipocyte Differentiation Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mesenchymal stem cell adipocyte differentiation medium/product/PromoCell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mesenchymal stem cell adipocyte differentiation medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    PromoCell mesenchymal stem cell growth medium
    Overview and time scale of re-replications experiments <t>Mesenchymal</t> stem cells were differentiated into osteoblasts, adipocytes, chondrocytes, and neurons, while myoblasts were differentiated into myotubes. Two experimental strategies were applied to detect re-replication during differentiation (A). For Rerep-seq the thymidine-analogue BrdU was added to the culture media. In the schematic representation of the re-replication bubble, yellow asterisks indicate BrdU integration. The black DNA strand represents parental DNA, the red strand corresponds to DNA from the first round of replication, the green strand to DNA from the second round, and the turquoise strand to DNA from the third round of replication. As described by Menzel et al. , UVA photolyzes incorporated BrdU converting it to Uracil. Subsequently, UDG excises the Uracil, generating an abasic site, while AP1 introduces single strand breaks at these positions. A representative agarose gel image demonstrates the effects of UVA, UDG, and AP1 treatment on DNA from chondrogenic differentiated hMSCs cultured with and without BrdU supplementation. For fiber-combing thymidine-analogues IdU and CldU were subsequently added to culture media. High molecular weight DNA was used for fiber-combing and further evaluated for fibers with simultaneous IdU and CldU incorporation. Time scale shows an overview on start and end points of all differentiation experiments (B). Yellow rectangles highlight timeframes where re-replication was detected with fiber-combing. Black arrows point on likely re-replication start points during the differentiation process. The figure was created using BioRender.
    Mesenchymal Stem Cell Growth Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mesenchymal stem cell growth medium/product/PromoCell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mesenchymal stem cell growth medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Characterisation of sEVs secreted by fetoplacental endothelial cells (fpECs) from term (T, n = 6), preterm (PT, n = 6) and Early‐Onset preeclamptic (EO‐PE, n = 4) pregnancies. (A) Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of sEVs (scale bar: 200 nm). (B) NTA: Size and concentration of particles, with size (x‐axis) plotted against particle concentration normalised to cell count at the time of isolation (y‐axis). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). (C) Violin plots display the total concentration of sEVs (normalised to cell count at isolation) as measured by NTA. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by pairwise Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Adjusted p values are indicated (* = p < 0.05; ns = not significant). (D) Western blot analysis of sEVs using established sEV markers (Alix, TSG101, Syntenin‐1), endothelial marker (CD31) and non‐vesicular marker (ApoB).

    Journal: Journal of Extracellular Biology

    Article Title: Proteomic Epithelial‐To‐Mesenchymal Transition Signature in Fetoplacental Small Extracellular Vesicles of Early‐Onset Preeclampsia

    doi: 10.1002/jex2.70122

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterisation of sEVs secreted by fetoplacental endothelial cells (fpECs) from term (T, n = 6), preterm (PT, n = 6) and Early‐Onset preeclamptic (EO‐PE, n = 4) pregnancies. (A) Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of sEVs (scale bar: 200 nm). (B) NTA: Size and concentration of particles, with size (x‐axis) plotted against particle concentration normalised to cell count at the time of isolation (y‐axis). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). (C) Violin plots display the total concentration of sEVs (normalised to cell count at isolation) as measured by NTA. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by pairwise Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Adjusted p values are indicated (* = p < 0.05; ns = not significant). (D) Western blot analysis of sEVs using established sEV markers (Alix, TSG101, Syntenin‐1), endothelial marker (CD31) and non‐vesicular marker (ApoB).

    Article Snippet: The cell pellet was resuspended in Endothelial Cell Growth Medium MV (ECGM; PromoCell, C‐22220, Heidelberg, Germany), supplemented with endothelial cell growth factor, hydrocortisone, epidermal growth factor (PromoCell, C‐39220), 0.05 mg/mL gentamicin (Gibco) and 10% defined FCS and plated in 12‐well plates coated with 1% gelatine (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

    Techniques: Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Concentration Assay, Cell Characterization, Isolation, Western Blot, Marker

    Descriptive statistics of proteomic analysis of fetoplacental‐endothelial derived sEVs from T ( n = 4), PT ( n = 5) and EO‐PE ( n = 4) pregnancies. (A) Venn diagram of identified proteins in the respective groups. Proteins were filtered to include those with >75% valid values in each group, resulting in 1098 proteins identified in T‐sEVs, 1179 proteins in PT‐sEVs and 1045 proteins in EO‐PE‐sEVs. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) of protein abundances in the proteome. PCA revealed distinct clustering between the proteomes of EO‐PE‐ and PT‐sEVs, while T‐sEVs overlapped both, indicating shared variability. (C) Volcano plots of quantified proteins. Significant proteins are highlighted in dark grey (T), blue (PT) and red (EO‐PE) circles (two‐sided t ‐test with p values corrected for FDR, statistically significant if absolute log 2 FC ≥ 1.2 and p value ≤ 0.05), while non‐significant proteins are depicted in smaller grey circles.

    Journal: Journal of Extracellular Biology

    Article Title: Proteomic Epithelial‐To‐Mesenchymal Transition Signature in Fetoplacental Small Extracellular Vesicles of Early‐Onset Preeclampsia

    doi: 10.1002/jex2.70122

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Descriptive statistics of proteomic analysis of fetoplacental‐endothelial derived sEVs from T ( n = 4), PT ( n = 5) and EO‐PE ( n = 4) pregnancies. (A) Venn diagram of identified proteins in the respective groups. Proteins were filtered to include those with >75% valid values in each group, resulting in 1098 proteins identified in T‐sEVs, 1179 proteins in PT‐sEVs and 1045 proteins in EO‐PE‐sEVs. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) of protein abundances in the proteome. PCA revealed distinct clustering between the proteomes of EO‐PE‐ and PT‐sEVs, while T‐sEVs overlapped both, indicating shared variability. (C) Volcano plots of quantified proteins. Significant proteins are highlighted in dark grey (T), blue (PT) and red (EO‐PE) circles (two‐sided t ‐test with p values corrected for FDR, statistically significant if absolute log 2 FC ≥ 1.2 and p value ≤ 0.05), while non‐significant proteins are depicted in smaller grey circles.

    Article Snippet: The cell pellet was resuspended in Endothelial Cell Growth Medium MV (ECGM; PromoCell, C‐22220, Heidelberg, Germany), supplemented with endothelial cell growth factor, hydrocortisone, epidermal growth factor (PromoCell, C‐39220), 0.05 mg/mL gentamicin (Gibco) and 10% defined FCS and plated in 12‐well plates coated with 1% gelatine (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

    Techniques: Derivative Assay

    Single-cell RNA sequencing profiling of joint cell populations following extracellular vesicle (EVs) treatment. (a) The UMAP plot displaying the classification of joint cell populations into ten distinct clusters under three conditions: WT, PBS-treated (PBS), and EVs-treated (EVs). ( b ) Cell typing of clusters based on gene expression. Cluster 1 (NK cells), Cluster 2 (T cells), Cluster 3 (pre-B cells), Cluster 4 (Neutrophils), Cluster 5 (B cells), Cluster 6 (Chondrocyte progenitor cells), Cluster 7 (Hematopoietic progenitors), Cluster 8 (Mesenchymal cells), Cluster 9 (Plasma cells), and Cluster 10 (Erythroblasts). ( c ) Heatmap displaying the expression of representative marker genes for each cluster, including Col12a1 for the

    Journal: Regenerative Therapy

    Article Title: Extracellular vesicles derived from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells prevent synovial inflammation and attenuate cartilage degeneration in rodent osteoarthritis

    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.101056

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Single-cell RNA sequencing profiling of joint cell populations following extracellular vesicle (EVs) treatment. (a) The UMAP plot displaying the classification of joint cell populations into ten distinct clusters under three conditions: WT, PBS-treated (PBS), and EVs-treated (EVs). ( b ) Cell typing of clusters based on gene expression. Cluster 1 (NK cells), Cluster 2 (T cells), Cluster 3 (pre-B cells), Cluster 4 (Neutrophils), Cluster 5 (B cells), Cluster 6 (Chondrocyte progenitor cells), Cluster 7 (Hematopoietic progenitors), Cluster 8 (Mesenchymal cells), Cluster 9 (Plasma cells), and Cluster 10 (Erythroblasts). ( c ) Heatmap displaying the expression of representative marker genes for each cluster, including Col12a1 for the "Chondrocyte" cluster, and Col1a1 for the "Mesenchymal cell" cluster, and CD45/CD14 for the "Hematopoietic" cluster.

    Article Snippet: For adipocyte differentiation, either BioMirai Lab's induction kit or PromoCell's mesenchymal stem cell adipocyte differentiation medium was used, with Oil Red O staining to assess lipid accumulation.

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Gene Expression, Clinical Proteomics, Expressing, Marker

    Differential gene expression besed on Single-cell RNA sequencing of joint cell clusters following extracellular vesicle (EVs) treatment . ( a-d ) Comparison of gene expression in EVs, PBS, and WT groups (a) in Cluster 6 (chondrocyte progenitors) (COL2A1, COL1A2, PRG4, MMP3, CCL2, and FGF18). ( b ) in Cluster 1 (NK cells) (CD14, MRC1, CD163, CD86, CD80, and NOS2). ( c ) in Cluster 8 (Mesenchymal cells) (COL2A1, COL1A2, PRG4, CCL2, and FGF18) ( d ) in Cluster 4 (Neutrophils) (APOE, AGPAT4, HAPLN1, CDKN1C, MET, and CEMIP2). (e) Flow cytometry analysis confirmed that the proportion of CD11b + CD163 + M2 macrophages was approximately 2.5-fold higher in the EVs-treated group compared to the PBS-treated group.

    Journal: Regenerative Therapy

    Article Title: Extracellular vesicles derived from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells prevent synovial inflammation and attenuate cartilage degeneration in rodent osteoarthritis

    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.101056

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Differential gene expression besed on Single-cell RNA sequencing of joint cell clusters following extracellular vesicle (EVs) treatment . ( a-d ) Comparison of gene expression in EVs, PBS, and WT groups (a) in Cluster 6 (chondrocyte progenitors) (COL2A1, COL1A2, PRG4, MMP3, CCL2, and FGF18). ( b ) in Cluster 1 (NK cells) (CD14, MRC1, CD163, CD86, CD80, and NOS2). ( c ) in Cluster 8 (Mesenchymal cells) (COL2A1, COL1A2, PRG4, CCL2, and FGF18) ( d ) in Cluster 4 (Neutrophils) (APOE, AGPAT4, HAPLN1, CDKN1C, MET, and CEMIP2). (e) Flow cytometry analysis confirmed that the proportion of CD11b + CD163 + M2 macrophages was approximately 2.5-fold higher in the EVs-treated group compared to the PBS-treated group.

    Article Snippet: For adipocyte differentiation, either BioMirai Lab's induction kit or PromoCell's mesenchymal stem cell adipocyte differentiation medium was used, with Oil Red O staining to assess lipid accumulation.

    Techniques: Gene Expression, RNA Sequencing, Comparison, Flow Cytometry

    Overview and time scale of re-replications experiments Mesenchymal stem cells were differentiated into osteoblasts, adipocytes, chondrocytes, and neurons, while myoblasts were differentiated into myotubes. Two experimental strategies were applied to detect re-replication during differentiation (A). For Rerep-seq the thymidine-analogue BrdU was added to the culture media. In the schematic representation of the re-replication bubble, yellow asterisks indicate BrdU integration. The black DNA strand represents parental DNA, the red strand corresponds to DNA from the first round of replication, the green strand to DNA from the second round, and the turquoise strand to DNA from the third round of replication. As described by Menzel et al. , UVA photolyzes incorporated BrdU converting it to Uracil. Subsequently, UDG excises the Uracil, generating an abasic site, while AP1 introduces single strand breaks at these positions. A representative agarose gel image demonstrates the effects of UVA, UDG, and AP1 treatment on DNA from chondrogenic differentiated hMSCs cultured with and without BrdU supplementation. For fiber-combing thymidine-analogues IdU and CldU were subsequently added to culture media. High molecular weight DNA was used for fiber-combing and further evaluated for fibers with simultaneous IdU and CldU incorporation. Time scale shows an overview on start and end points of all differentiation experiments (B). Yellow rectangles highlight timeframes where re-replication was detected with fiber-combing. Black arrows point on likely re-replication start points during the differentiation process. The figure was created using BioRender.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Physiological re-replication during human stem cell differentiation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.02.27.708451

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Overview and time scale of re-replications experiments Mesenchymal stem cells were differentiated into osteoblasts, adipocytes, chondrocytes, and neurons, while myoblasts were differentiated into myotubes. Two experimental strategies were applied to detect re-replication during differentiation (A). For Rerep-seq the thymidine-analogue BrdU was added to the culture media. In the schematic representation of the re-replication bubble, yellow asterisks indicate BrdU integration. The black DNA strand represents parental DNA, the red strand corresponds to DNA from the first round of replication, the green strand to DNA from the second round, and the turquoise strand to DNA from the third round of replication. As described by Menzel et al. , UVA photolyzes incorporated BrdU converting it to Uracil. Subsequently, UDG excises the Uracil, generating an abasic site, while AP1 introduces single strand breaks at these positions. A representative agarose gel image demonstrates the effects of UVA, UDG, and AP1 treatment on DNA from chondrogenic differentiated hMSCs cultured with and without BrdU supplementation. For fiber-combing thymidine-analogues IdU and CldU were subsequently added to culture media. High molecular weight DNA was used for fiber-combing and further evaluated for fibers with simultaneous IdU and CldU incorporation. Time scale shows an overview on start and end points of all differentiation experiments (B). Yellow rectangles highlight timeframes where re-replication was detected with fiber-combing. Black arrows point on likely re-replication start points during the differentiation process. The figure was created using BioRender.

    Article Snippet: The cells were seeded at a density of 100,000/25 cm 2 flask with Mesenchymal Stem cell Growth Medium (PromoCell) and expanded for 1 passage before induction of differentiation.

    Techniques: Agarose Gel Electrophoresis, Cell Culture, Analogues, High Molecular Weight

    Analysis of extranuclear DNA during differentiation Mesenchymal stem cells were grown on glass slides with corresponding differentiation media and supplemented with thymidine-analogue EdU during timeframes of re-replication determined before. EdU incorporation is detected with red fluorescence (Alexa-Fluor-594) and DNA was counterstained with Hoechst33342 in blue. An example of osteogenic differentiated hMSCs is shown and three enlarged views point to extranuclear spots and clusters of DNAs that were microdissected (A). In total 1200-1600 extranuclear DNAs were collected for further DNA isolation and sequencing for each differentiation experiment. During adipogenic differentiation extranuclear DNA was detectable after 3d and 4d and during osteogenic differentiation after 4d of differentiation. Results of sequencing analysis of extranuclear DNA were displayed using IGV with data range on the y-axis adjusted for all extranuclear DNA reads. For each differentiation extranuclear DNA sequencing (dark blue) is displayed above the corresponding Rerep-seq results (green). Representative examples for gene regions on chromosome 12 (B) and 7 (C) revealed that extranuclear DNA overlaps with re-replicated DNA regions.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Physiological re-replication during human stem cell differentiation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.02.27.708451

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of extranuclear DNA during differentiation Mesenchymal stem cells were grown on glass slides with corresponding differentiation media and supplemented with thymidine-analogue EdU during timeframes of re-replication determined before. EdU incorporation is detected with red fluorescence (Alexa-Fluor-594) and DNA was counterstained with Hoechst33342 in blue. An example of osteogenic differentiated hMSCs is shown and three enlarged views point to extranuclear spots and clusters of DNAs that were microdissected (A). In total 1200-1600 extranuclear DNAs were collected for further DNA isolation and sequencing for each differentiation experiment. During adipogenic differentiation extranuclear DNA was detectable after 3d and 4d and during osteogenic differentiation after 4d of differentiation. Results of sequencing analysis of extranuclear DNA were displayed using IGV with data range on the y-axis adjusted for all extranuclear DNA reads. For each differentiation extranuclear DNA sequencing (dark blue) is displayed above the corresponding Rerep-seq results (green). Representative examples for gene regions on chromosome 12 (B) and 7 (C) revealed that extranuclear DNA overlaps with re-replicated DNA regions.

    Article Snippet: The cells were seeded at a density of 100,000/25 cm 2 flask with Mesenchymal Stem cell Growth Medium (PromoCell) and expanded for 1 passage before induction of differentiation.

    Techniques: Fluorescence, DNA Extraction, Sequencing, DNA Sequencing

    Asymmetric re-replication Fiber-combing experiments revealed several replication forks with varying combinations of replication and/or re-replication events. Representative examples shown, derived from neurogenic (A, B) and adipogenic (C) differentiated mesenchymal stem cells. Re-replication on two strands of the replication fork but differing in length between strands (A), re-replication only on one strand with no re-replication on the other strand of the replication fork (B) and re-replication only on one strand showing no detectable replication at the other strand of the replication fork (C). DNA is shown in blue (false color YOYO-stain) and thymidine-analogue detection is shown in red for IdU and green for CldU. Re-replicated fiber tracks appear as yellow fluorescence. Scale bars represent 20 µm = 40kb.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Physiological re-replication during human stem cell differentiation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.02.27.708451

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Asymmetric re-replication Fiber-combing experiments revealed several replication forks with varying combinations of replication and/or re-replication events. Representative examples shown, derived from neurogenic (A, B) and adipogenic (C) differentiated mesenchymal stem cells. Re-replication on two strands of the replication fork but differing in length between strands (A), re-replication only on one strand with no re-replication on the other strand of the replication fork (B) and re-replication only on one strand showing no detectable replication at the other strand of the replication fork (C). DNA is shown in blue (false color YOYO-stain) and thymidine-analogue detection is shown in red for IdU and green for CldU. Re-replicated fiber tracks appear as yellow fluorescence. Scale bars represent 20 µm = 40kb.

    Article Snippet: The cells were seeded at a density of 100,000/25 cm 2 flask with Mesenchymal Stem cell Growth Medium (PromoCell) and expanded for 1 passage before induction of differentiation.

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, Staining, Fluorescence